I gasped the first time I saw this video a while back! Further advancing the theory that it is a liberal-progressive instinct to cover up or destroy any idea that threatens their own.
Notice the lady who was pushed over is the one who came down from Vancouver, BC to help out with GAP last year?
She has post-abortive written all over her. I am all for using the signs on college campuses but I don't want my kids seeing them. They represent the truth of abortion and all adults need to see them, but not kids.
Anonymous, I agree with you. Kids do not need to be seeing such things (here I am thinking of kids under the age of 10 or 12).
The problem is, late night television, Newsweek, and the New York Times refuse to run the images. Money is not the issue -- the Center for Bioethical Reform has tried each of these venues.
So what are we to do when every mass media outlet is denied us?
Well, the only thing we *can* do is put the pictures on the sides of trucks, sandwich boards, or tow them behind airplanes.
No doubt, this form of communication does not discriminate, and, regretably, little children will see the pictures.
But the question we must ask ourselves is, which do we care more about: the feelings of born children, or the lives of unborn children?
Frankly, I think lives trump feelings. So I'm compelled to show the graphic images in public.
4 comments:
I gasped the first time I saw this video a while back! Further advancing the theory that it is a liberal-progressive instinct to cover up or destroy any idea that threatens their own.
Notice the lady who was pushed over is the one who came down from Vancouver, BC to help out with GAP last year?
Yes I saw that. Do you know if this happened before or after GAP '06?
If you watch the video closely you can see the girl who pushes her down walk behind for a few seconds...and then she shoves her down.
She has post-abortive written all over her. I am all for using the signs on college campuses but I don't want my kids seeing them. They represent the truth of abortion and all adults need to see them, but not kids.
Anonymous, I agree with you. Kids do not need to be seeing such things (here I am thinking of kids under the age of 10 or 12).
The problem is, late night television, Newsweek, and the New York Times refuse to run the images. Money is not the issue -- the Center for Bioethical Reform has tried each of these venues.
So what are we to do when every mass media outlet is denied us?
Well, the only thing we *can* do is put the pictures on the sides of trucks, sandwich boards, or tow them behind airplanes.
No doubt, this form of communication does not discriminate, and, regretably, little children will see the pictures.
But the question we must ask ourselves is, which do we care more about: the feelings of born children, or the lives of unborn children?
Frankly, I think lives trump feelings. So I'm compelled to show the graphic images in public.
Post a Comment